Ed Graph EditorAs a software developer, I used to use Graphviz for my code comprehension needs. While its compact format has its advantages, it was just too much effort to input data particularly relationships. I wanted to be able to create relationships by dragging my mouse from one node to another. This is exactly how y. Ed works. You dont have to sacrifice the longevity of plain text that Graphviz files offer. Ed works entirely on the XML based Graph. ML format. You get the same benefits of cross platform support and exporting to SVG, PNG, PDF etc. Graphviz. But y. Ed  is that it is written in Java yet has a 1. Mac, you can zoom in and out with 2 finger scrolling. The best feature for me is its ability to group nodes and collapseexpand them. This makes it possible to capture much bigger graphs in a single file than with Graphviz in which I had to mess with numerical properties. Graph Visualization. Graph visualization is a way of representing structural information as diagrams of abstract graphs and networks. It has important applications in. Graph drawing is an area of mathematics and computer science combining methods from geometric graph theory and information visualization to derive twodimensional. Graph Drawing Software Free DownloadLayouts also give you the ability to comprehend your data in different ways, and when you change layout it animates the transition which makes the experience fun. Ed, which is free, is probably better than any non free software out there, and Ive never had to upgrade it since I first heard of it, and havent noticed any bugs. Im really grateful for y. Python Wifi Signal Monitor. Works for this product and hope it stays around as long as I live. Sridhar Sarnobat Software Engineer at E Touch Systems in Fremont, CA. GraphDraw.jpg' alt='Graph Drawing Software' title='Graph Drawing Software' />Polargraph drawing by robot. To assemble a Polarshield, I need to cut these strips of pin headers into strips of 8 pins. I would usually count out 8 pins, then cut with a knife, then use that resulting piece as a gauge to cut the rest of the strip. It took attention. Just this afternoon, I took probably less than five minutes to make a little cutting guide out of cardboard. Bingo An onerous job that required me to concentrate AND count became something that creates a much lower cognitive load. This building process is full of lessons very like this Use the right tool for the job. Example put a fresh scalpel blade in, remember how good life can feel. Make helpers for fiddly tasks. Example this cutting jig, which is nothing more than a slot cut in some card, and some arrows drawn on. In summary When youre positive that youre cutting the right tree down, then stop to sharpen the axe. I have never formalised my workflow. It has always been more important to me that I retained my agility to be able to make changes to the design, so building jigs and bulk buying pre cut parts has seemed dangerous. Recently, Ive made a decision to be a bit more efficient with my time, to optimise for throughput rather than flexibility, so this has led to me working on a big batch of twenty Polarshields at once, rather than just making them up in response to orders as I used to. There are particular bits of the build process that are fiddly and error prone, but tolerable when Im building only one or two of these devices. Or rather, the cost and risk of developing a jig to help is disproportionate if it is only going to be used on one circuit board. When it comes to adding the same part twenty times, then suddenly the cost of the jig doesnt seem too outrageous given the benefits. In fact it seems stupid not to build a jig. The risk is something else, and by risk I mean that I could spend an afternoon modelling a 3d printable or laser cuttable set of templates in order to hold the part just so, and allow me to clamp the PCB on, and then get super accurate, repeatable solder joints. And its all wasted if I mis measure one tiny thing, or get my part thickness slightly wrong. I have made the assumption in the past that jigs would naturally have to be super functional and professional to be worth having, theyd have to tick multiple boxes of precision, speed of use and robustness. But in this case, I just used cardboard. It wont last forever, and itll degrade with use, but the cost is essentially zero, and it was designed using a pencil and a ruler, not hours in front of a 3. D modelling tool. Its the 8. 0, and past here, theres diminishing returns. More obvious lessons from Polargraph.